Is Deferred Adjudication legal?
Can the state of Texas make a contract and not honor it? That is
exactly what the state of Texas is doing, by not allowing people
to expunge their criminal records. Once time has been served, and
if no other cases are pending individuals should have the opportunity
to expunge their records, not just seal them. If they are not given
this opportunity then rehabilitating some one has no value. It there
is no hope for these people who are in the system. Then cannot return
to a normal life, because the state focuses on building more prisons,
instead of rewarding those individuals who succeed by clearing their
records, Texas instead chooses to make money by selling the most
embarrassing facts of a persons past. As a result of the dishonor
of Texas making money by selling official state records to background
check companies, Texas is constantly building more prison. Deferred
Adjudication, and other probations leave a permanent mark on the
criminal histories of individuals.
Read some of these opinions on what Deferred Adjudication really
is really meant to be.
FCRA (Fair Credit Reporting Act)
This is acronym what is referred to as the seven
years law. The law was changed back in 1998 and it now prevents people
from starting over in seven years. It basically keeps people in their
place and prevents them from achieving success. Click
here to read more on this topic.
Texas Workforce Commission
This organization considers deferred adjudication a conviction and explains how
to ask questions to perspective employees on employment applications. Click
here to read the article
Also from this organization, criminal background checks for 1 dollar.
Texas Workforce commission can do a criminal background check for
1 dollar. That is all it takes for TWC to ruin chances to get a good
job. Click
here to read more on this topic.
TIME LIMITS FOR REPORTING CRIMINAL RECORDS ON A
BACKGROUND CHECK IN THE STATE OF TEXAS
Time
Limites for reporting criminal records on a background check
in the State of Texas
(Listen
to Audio)
By D Lindel
November 18, 2003
One of the biggest problems that people have with a deferred adjudication (DA)
on their record is the problems that it causes in finding a job, renting a
place to live, getting some types of insurance, and obtaining some state issued
professional licenses. There are other issues created by a DA, but the main
ones outlined above seem to affect nearly everyone.
A background check, as it has become known as, is in reality part
of a greater more in depth report that can delve into other areas
such as your credit standing, character, general reputation, mode
of living, driving records, property ownership, civil court records,
education, sex offender, and last but not least, criminal records.
These types of reports are more accurately known as a “consumer
report” as identified by the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA)and
the Texas Business & Commerce Code. Businesses that regularly
engage wholly or partly in assembling this type of information, and
sell it to a third party for a monetary fee are identified as a “consumer
reporting agency” (CRA) and are subject to regulation under
both the federal and state statutes, FCRA and Business & Commerce
Code.
Prior to 1999 there was a time limit of 7 years under both statutes
that said any negative information pertaining to credit history,
bankruptcies, civil suits, paid tax liens, accounts place for collection,
and criminal records was not reportable after 7 years from the date
that the incident occurred. In 1999 The FCRA was amended as far as
the reporting of criminal records as that time limit was changed
to an open ended period with no time limits. However,
at this time Texas and 11 other states elected to stick with the
old seven year rule as covered under the Business & Commerce
Code. (Business
and Commerce Code Chapter 20 Subsection 20.05 "Reporting of
Information Prohibited). This is very important:
This 7 year limitation is only applicable if there is a CRA involved
in developing the consumer report for sale to a third party. If a
prospective employer does the investigation themselves, there are
no time limits as to what can be reported to the prospective employer.
Now you’re most likely asking “What good does this do
me?” The answer is that more and more employers are hiring
a CRA to do the consumer report on prospective employees as most
don’t understand the law and don’t want to face any liability
if they make a mistake. Generally the tip off to the prospective
employee as to whither a CRA is involved is that the authorization
form for the report to be run will ask for information only for the
past 7 years. Also this form will be separate from the application
itself. If the report comes back with incorrect information, there
is a process allowed by both the FCRA and the Business & Commerce
Code that allows the “consumer” (job applicant) to dispute
the incorrect information and the CRA must reinvestigate and correct
the report or the CRA is subject to monetary penalties.
The bottom line is that if you apply for a job, housing, insurance,
etc., and the consumer report is being developed by a CRA, and your
offense is over 7 years old, there should, by law, be no problem
for the applicant.
Click
here to post your comments to this story on our discussion
board
Check out Marty's Opinion one more time.
by
Valente G.
September 17, 2003
 
The Letter by Marty of www.wipetheslateclean.com offers a very detailed
reason why the issue of deferred adjudication should be visited by
legislators.
Click
here to read
August 6, 2003
By
Valente G.
Is deferred adjudication a contract? Are
Texas employment agencies wrong, and can a legal case be brought
up against them?
The argument is getting stronger urging everyone to pursue all avenues to get
deferred adjudication cases before judges. There are some people who believe
that deferred adjudication should be considered a breach of contract, here
is some information that will be useful in launching a legal suit.
T.S.A. LEGAL GUIDANCE ON CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORDS CHECKS
This Legal Guidance document, prepared by the Office of Chief Counsel,
provides information for decision makers involved in adjudicating
background checks on individuals with unescorted access authority
at our nation’s airports. The purpose of this document is to
ensure uniformity in the adjudication of background checks for airport
and air carrier workers. This Legal Guidance does not create any
right or benefit, substantive or procedural, legally enforceable
by any party other than the Transportation Security Administration.
Click here to read the TSA Document 
|